The Raw Truth

I am going to mention two things at once in this post, so I apologise in advance for not doing full justice to either. Here is a picture of friends Gerry and Elisabeth on the summit of the little gem of a mountain in the Trossachs called Ben A’n. I found it while doing a new year tidy up of my lightroom catalogue. Here’s the picture:

Ben An Summit

The two things I want to highlight are that I had a major file corruption issue with a lot of my precious files over the end of 2007 and the start of 2008, in which I have lost a lot of data. (More about this in a  posting soon). So I was sad on naming this folder of otherwise uninteresting files to note the corruption that you will see in the next picture. I realised that I could clone it out because it was in easy areas of the sky to deal with. My second point is one to which I will certainly return later, not only is the picture corrupted, but it was far from a great picture in terms of exposure. Gerry and Elisabeth are slightly backlit and underexposed, perhaps exposure compensation or fill-in flash (my then 400D had no spot metering) would have helped, but I used none of them. I did take the picture in RAW file format, so look how easy it was for me a year on to:

  • warm it up with the colour temp slider.
  • Increase the vibrance/colour saturation
  • Increase the clarity/ midrange definition
  • Use a virtual grad filter on the sky to darken it
  • Use a virtual grad filter on the foreground to brighten it
  • Change the curves to brighten faces
  • Use the spot repair tool to clone the corruption out of the sky

And all of this without going into photoshop elements even once. I love lightroom. (Corruption issue aside).

The original (I’m embarrassed to show you).

img_3961-2

If you can use RAW format, and can be bothered with a little tweaking, you should!

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

The Strange Case of the Almost-Compact Camera

As soon as I got my LX3 I wanted a case for it. The whole back is taken up by a spectacularly bright screen that screams to all sharp pocketed objects, “since there isn’t an ipod around, scratch me instead”. No bother I thought. “I’ll just pop along to my local camera store, Currys as it happens, and peruse their pretty large range of compact cases; nope! Nothing fits the LX3 in any reasonable way and they have about 10 compact cases. The problem is that although the body is smallish, the lens is permanently sticking out, meaning you need a fairly thick but still small case for it.

Next step, on my first evening of ownership was to go to the websites. I liked the Panasonic custom fitting leather cases, but they are expensive, and no-one actually seemed to have UK stock. I loved them though, they add to the retro look of the camera, like a rangefinder case from earlier days. Next stop, as I didn’t want to order one from Japan, at £70 plus posting was the Lowepro site. This has a helpful PDF file listing the LX3 and telling you all the cases that fit the camera. They also gave the dimensions of the interior. I measured the required dimensions to accommodate the slightly fuller figure (in compact camera terms) of the LX3 and discovered that they were lying, almost all of them were too flat/thin to take the protruding lens.

Next day I went to Jessops with my LX3 in its protective polythene wrapper and tried another 10 cases, none of which fitted, including one which is offered by Jessops in an online bundle deal with the LX3! Finally success, I found only one, the Lowepro Apex 30 AW. I bought it there and then. My camera was now protected, and these cases are well made and include belt loops and shoulder straps for hillwalking etc, and this case would be ideal for that purpose. It still felt a little bulky and of course had to be taken out of the case to be used. The fancy Panasonic Leather one allows you to use the LX3 in the case. I looked again and found a UK dealer over a December weekend who took my payment and promised to send it next working day.

The next working day, Monday arrived with a glorious email, and I kid you not saying, “out of stock, we apologise for any incontinence“. So I phoned and cancelled my order as they were unsure when the stock might arrive. So finally, exasperated I ordered the Japanese suppliers original Panasonic case, paid by pay pal and settled in for a long wait. Actually it came on the next Thursday. That’s ordered late Monday morning Delivered Thursday sometime, from Japan to Scotland, UK. In case you care, the very courteous business was:

http://myworld.ebay.co.uk/giftshop-jp/

So do I like the case? I’ve used it about two weeks and I love it. It slips into a pocket neatly, as long as its a jacket pocket, it slings over a shoulder nicely if you have no jacket, it looks fantastic and you can even attach it to a tripod without removing the case. When you need to remove it, one simple screw into the tripod socket, which has an aluminium finger wheel is all it takes. It’s expensive, but it is really well made and wraps the LX3 in about as small a space as you could manage  while still offering physical protection.

Wouldn’t it be nice if manufacturers actually gave us a case in the box? I wonder how many people scratch these screens before they get one.

Here it is:

img_0028

And with the top cover removed. In use you can just undo the 2 side-studs and it will hang by the bottom one so that you can take pictures instantly without working out where to pop the cover:

img_0029

And the rear view showing access to controls:

img_0030

And fully removed:

img_0032

Here’s the excellent but different Lowepro:

img_0034

and the back:

img_0036

Now note the natty built in raincover, perfect for outdoor types. Remember this is a perfect handheld landscape camera with it’s 24mm lens.

img_0037

And finally, the sleepy LX3 settling down for a snooze……..zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

img_0038

night-night

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Sally

sally

This is one of my very favourite pictures. It doesn’t really cut it as a portrait, but the sheer starkness of Sally’s imposition against the Matterhorn is fantastic. Taking people-pictures in bright midday light always results in shadowy eyes. People wearing hats and sunglases makes the problem even worse. I this case Sally’s hat and ponytail make the shadow on her face interesting. She looks really stylish and sporty from her outline, she’s in a fabulous place, so who is she? Basically she seems like a really interesting person, and you wan’t to see more. A good photograph can always leave you wanting more.

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Have Canon Dropped the Ball?

I use a Canon 40D. I am really pleased with it and if I never had another camera I could continue to make great images with it, but I am a photographer, and it’s not in our nature not to want a better camera, especially at a time like the present when every new generation adds so much. It’s not just gimmicks either, basic image quality and resolution, not to mention noise performance are all improving rapidly. I have had the 40D for over a year and during that time I have learned what I think I want in a camera:

Full frame or 1.3x frame like the 1DMk3

A normal size, not built in sidegrip like the Canon 1D’s (Too big and heavy)

Good noise performance at 1600 ISO or beyond

Fast autofocus, with good frame coverage, like the Nikon D700 or Canon 1Ds Mk3

Reasonable frame rate, although I almost never use the 6+ fps the 40D can give. 3 or 4 would do.

Live view, for macro

A good screen for reviewing fine focus

In body Image Stabilisation. (For my prime lenses)

So what’s my problem? The only upgrade path Canon has given me is the new 50D. This is essentially my 40D on steroids. It has 15 megapixels as opposed to my 40D’s 10 megapixels. They claim to have redesigned the sensor to improve noise, but the serious reviews like DP review’s say that the sensor is overpopulated with pixels. The result is no noise improvement in the face of Nikon’s D300 which is a great camera, and beating the 50D in the reviews. They are £900 and £850 respectively, so direct competitors. If I was starting again, I would buy the Nikon; its better in lots of ways, the trouble is amateurs like me can’t suddenly change our cameras since we have a collection of lenses worth more than the camera. The Nikon has much better noise performance, but why? I think the sensor on the Canon is slightly smaller (APS – C 22.2 x 14.8mm) than the Nikon DX sensor (23.6 x 15.7). Sensibly the Nikon has pushed resolution to 12 or so megapixels, Canon went for 15 megapixels in a smaller sensor. You don’t need to be a former Physics teacher (which I am) to know this is madness without some secret technology breakthrough. The future may well be black silicon, but for the moment both companies are using similar technology and Canon therefore seem to have allowed the marketing people to go for the headline pixel count, on a smaller sensor.

I admit there is much to like about the 50D. There is the high res screen, the compensation for front or back-focusing lenses, the resolution in good light, but serious commentators are saying, it doesn’t amount to significantly better picture quality than I have at present.

So my next choice from Canon, the recently released 5D Mk2. This ticks most of my boxes, although we will have to see the reviews over the next few weeks as it is newly released. It is full frame, with 21 megapixels, and I think I would really like one, but its £2000. Hopefully the much larger sensor can support the greater pixel density and result in a better noise performance at 1600 ISO than I have at present. So to update my image quality significantly, I need to go from my current £600 ish camera, to a £2000 camera. What are you playing at Canon? Nikon could do me a better camera at £900, and their full frame, 12 odd megapixel dream D700, which lets you photograph miners at work by the sparks of their pickaxes costs £1600. Get your act together Canon, this is an all or nothing upgrade path! Right now if you are buying into a new DSLR, I’d say, buy a Nikon.

Why do I care? I’ve just sold my second 40D, bought to see me through a repair under guarantee, and I’m feeling ready to divert the funds into an upgrade. If I had a Nikon, I could afford it, with Canon, I can’t.

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Jackie

jackie

ISO 800, f5.6, 1/10th (78mm)

Note: (Zoomed out 5.6 may have been my largest available stop!)

I thought I would post an old portrait from my summer holiday this year. I considered this as a possible favourite portrait for yesterday’s blog entry, but wasn’t sure that it was my actual favourite, but it’s one of my favourites. It certainly reminds me that good portraits as in all types of photography are made by great light.

I had my Canon 40D with me, but only my Sigma 18-200 “walkabout” lens as we were on a walking holiday in the Swiss Alps. This isn’t a perfect portrait lens, but when the light is great, you go for it. This was in an alpine hut at about 3000m with only small windows letting in bright evening light. One window was behind Jackie and the other at a larger distance was on her right. The window behind was backlighting her and bathing her hair, while the more distant one was filling shadows and possibly very slightly “rimlighting” and creating lovely definition to Jackie’s face. As soon as I saw the light I asked if it was OK to photograph her, picked up my everpresent 40D, set to ISO 800 and asked her to stay still as the image stabilisation on the Sigma lens could only cope with the slow shutter if she was like a statue. How I wish I’d had my Canon 50mm f1.4 with me, but really the point is that the light makes this regardless of the lens. Doesn’t she look great?

To satisfy the curious among you, here is the hut:

the-rothornhutte

And a view out of one of it’s windows perhaps giving an idea of the dark/light contrast within:

matterhorn-from-the-rothornhutte

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *