The unbearable wetness of being!

P1010370

I drove out to my nearest Supermarket tonight for some essentials. I had hoped to go for a night-time run as as my habit, but another day of torrential-near freezing rain put paid to that. I started work just as darkness ended, left my work in darkness and heavy sleet, so I didn’t intend to take any pictures. I did like the odd reflection pan around the eerily-lit unmanned forecourt, so I thought I would share the West of Scotland rain in it’s full glory with you. The lovely little Panasonic G3 with its kit lens did the honours as it was in my car. This was ISO 6400 to get a handheld speed of 1/30th. There was no way I was standing there long enough to set up a tripod!

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Glasgow Tower

P1010360-2

My lovely Panasonic G3 was in my car when I had to visit the Glasgow Science centre a few weeks ago. On leaving the meeting I snatched a few minutes to take a handheld shot of the “Glasgow Tower”. I didn’t think I could add much to the 5,000,000 or so shots of the tower directly so I photographed it in reflection so that I would only be competing with a 1,000,000 or so similar shots.

I really love the architecture of the Science Centre! Black and white seems to accentuate the shapes and the slight distortions of the office window panels better than the colour version did.

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Lightroom frustrations

IMG_1772

The ferry terminal at Gourock with the Argyll mountains behind.

I found this old file from May 6th 2007 while trying to repair my Lightroom file structure yesterday. It isn’t how I would tackle the picture now in terms of aperture at least, however, I never found the Lightroom adjustments all that capable on what was an ordinary file at best. Upgrading the file to use the current lightroom editing tools amazed me. There was detail and interest in there that the Lightroom editor of 7-years on pulled out effortlessly.

It really could be worth revisiting old files.  If you care about Lightroom file structures then read on. If not, then step away from the blog!

I spent a few hours yesterday doing something that I really don’t much enjoy! I was transferring the lightroom files from my macbook to my external hard drive. The trouble is that it is so unintuitive that I had to try two different things to get it to work.

I first of all connected the external drive and opened Lightroom from that (master) catalogue file. With that running on the same laptop as the Lightroom catalogue I wanted to import, I thought I would try the “import catalogue” command. I ticked the option to say that I did want the digital negatives or whatever imported. It seemed to work, I took the drive to my main machine and discovered that it had not! Much reading on the web later, I then opened the laptop catalogue again, and this time “exported catalogue” to a folder. More connecting of the external drive, relaunching of the master catalogue file, and now importing the exported catalogue file. It appeared to work at it for a while then confirmed completion. It kind of worked!

Now my real frustration started. The new files were there somewhere, but the folder structure was gone. My 2015 folder from my laptop catalogue totally missing, yet the files where there. I only know this because I repeated the process to restore the clearly missing folders and had Lightroom tell me that it couldn’t copy the files as they were already there. Cue about 3+ hours of manually searching for dates within the metadata filters and then emptying mislabeled folders, creating new ones with the date protocol or restoring some files to partially empty folders. It took ages and I now have some folders which I renamed but which appear to be duplicated as pure date titled folders. Final moan, lots of these files showed an icon which informed me that their metadata had been changed by another programme and offered me two options, to read the data from disc or to overwrite it; no I don’t have a clue which I should do either.

I’m happy now that I seem to have no obvious lost data, (although back in 2008 I had a problem with corrupted data which I still think was Lightroom related), and a repaired folder structure. My point is this however, Lightroom’s folder management is basically crap. I know that it is a hugely capable and complex file system which can if operated by someone who really understands it, make your life easier, but it is desperately unintuitive. Could it have a basic mode and still be capable of managing an external hard drive or two and a few machines.

If folders are changed or moved on importing it could warn you (in proper language) that the structure is being compromised. It could automatically file everything in date folders even after importing. Here is the most annoying, if there is a folder inside the 2012 folder called “2012” then it could twig that that is stupid and warn you that you have inappropriate nesting of folders occurring. I had multiples of this across 2006 – 2013!

Let me be clear, despite how this sounds, I love Lightroom and I am an absolute devotee. I have persuaded as many people as I can that this is the one programme they need, however, the file management is simply too unintuitive, too error prone, and therefore for most of us badly flawed. Adobe, please address this!

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Maya

IMG_0555-2

Yet another from HB’s birthday party last weekend. HB has 3 particular little friends from her nursery, and Maya makes up the trio of friends. She is the sweetest little girl, and although I have talked about how nice it is to be greeted with their big smiles, Maya was the little angel who actually exclaimed with pleasure when she realised who the photographer was! I just love her earnest and open expression here!

I made a (excusable in the circumstances I hope) blunder in that I photographed little Maya with a particularly strongly patterned bag behind her head. It is also a strongly coloured bag and between both elements I confess they distracted from Maya’s face. Reducing the bag clarity with a local adjustment brush and converting to black and white really reduces the problem.

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Angel

_MG_0377

I am fascinated by why we take pictures? The Angel of the North is probably fairly well photographed! Many photographers who have the kind of talent that means their photographs featuring regularly on magazine covers, will have nailed every angle and every kind of light; so why do any of us bother anymore?

_MG_0385

There are so many reasons I suppose. Let me consider just 2:

  1. You love the place and the subject. In this case I truly adore the “Angel” and the feeling I had when my brother and sis-in-law first took me to see it has not left me. Something about that first moment of seeing it again still has all the passion intact. If you are a photographer, then one of your instincts is to intensify those feelings. Looking through your camera, refining, framing, taking time, is like a drug that amplifies your visual senses! That is why millions of people photograph special places like the “Angel” even though they won’t improve on the commercial postcard images already available; they just need to “feel through their cameras”.
  2. You are with people! In other words, you can be sure that 1000 of the best landscape photographers can not best your picture of your friend using the “Angel” as a setting. They, after all are not ever going to get the chance to try. You my photographic friends, can photograph a friend, and get an exclusive moment that the cliched place has never known. In the first example my daughter HB was only there with me that once, and she provides something very unique to my image.

Of course, my thoughts might just be a bit pessimistic. Take the game of chess. 16 pieces each side, and only 64 squares, and yet the permutations for unique games are estimated to be comparable to the number of atoms in the known universe. Different camera, lens, light level, light type, position, sky, background, processing approaches, etc, could conceivably mean that the game is not as futile as it seems. An interesting game to play, and lets be honest photographers, a few of you have been vain enough to try this, is to choose one of your favourite images of a well photographed place and to do a Flickr search for it. Instead of the 100’s of images blowing yours away, sometimes you find that your image is genuinely up there, competing!

So hang in there and go for it anyway!

Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *